Hence estimates how a matter is likely to be decided from verified past orders of the same court, the bench and the counsel involved, and shows the reasoning behind every estimate.
Live output on verified Delhi High Court orders. Each estimate is broken down into the facts, bench and counsel terms that produce it.
Write the matter in plain English, as you would to a colleague. Hence identifies the forum, the matter type, who you act for and the legally relevant facts, under BNSS or the old CrPC.
A model trained on verified orders estimates the outlook and breaks it down by fact, bench and counsel. Thin records are shrunk toward the average so they can't overclaim.
A strategy note: what to lead with, what the other side will argue, and what to file. It cites only curated Supreme Court authority and never invents case law.
The likelihood of a favourable order on your facts, before a specific bench or the roster as a whole.
How each bench on the current roster has ruled on comparable facts, with time to disposal and hearing counts.
Advocates ranked by track record in your matter type and before your bench, measured against what the facts predicted.
Where more than one court has jurisdiction, compare the likely outcome and median time to an order in each.
Full-text search across every ingested judgment, each tagged with its bench, counsel, outcome and facts.
A privileged note you can export: lead arguments, anticipated objections, the authorities in play and next steps.
data/orders.json to run on real records.